Saturday, October 7, 2023

Canada: COVID-19 Cases and Adverse Health Reaction Statistics for COVID-19 Vaccines to October 7, 2023

 


COVID-19 Cases in Canada to October 4, 2023

▶️ Dec. 14, 2020: 460,743 COVID-19 Cases in Canada

▶️ Vaccines started being administered in Canada

▶️ October 4, 2023: 4,738,938 COVID-19 Cases

▶️ 90% ⬆️ in Cases in 🇨🇦 after masks; vaccines; lockdowns etc.

▶️ 76% ⬆️ in COVID-19 Deaths after vaccines started

Source: Worldometer. (4 October 2023). Total Coronavirus Cases in Canada. Retrieved from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/canada/

______________________________________________

Canadian COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Health Reaction Statistics Update, to September 15, 2023

▶️ 57,436 Adverse Health reports (AHR's)

▶️ 11,231 Serious; 46,205 Non-serious AH

▶️ 455 Deaths; 1,604 Circulatory cases

▶️ 6,824 Special Interest AE’s; 1,207 Myocarditis/Pericarditis cases

▶️ 90% ⬆️ in COVID-19 cases since vaccines started in 🇨🇦  

▶️ New cases since vaccines started in 🇨🇦4,278,195

▶️ Total cases to October 4, 2023: 4,738,938

Source: Government of Canada. (29 September 2023). Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada, up to September 15, 2023. Retrieved from: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/

© 2023 Tracey Young/Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety & Justice. All Rights Reserved. 

_____________________________________

#COVID19 #COVID19vaccines #InformedConsent #Canada 

Friday, April 14, 2023

Elder law: Ontario nursing home law violates Charter, advocates allege in lawsuit

 


Ontario nursing home law violates Charter,advocates allege in lawsuit

Government introduced and quickly passed Bill 7 last fall

Canadian Press/Canadian Lawyer Magazine (13 April 2023). https://www.canadianlawyermag.com/business-news/ontario-nursing-home-law-violates-charter-advocates-allege-in-lawsuit/375133.

A new Ontario law that allows hospitals to fine discharged patients $400 a day if they do not move into a nursing home not of their choosing violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, advocates allege in a lawsuit filed Wednesday.

The Ontario Health Coalition and the Advocacy Centre for the Elderly said the new law, the More Beds, Better Care Act, also known as Bill 7, strips away several rights of older patients.

“Bill 7 singles out a particular cohort of older, ill and very vulnerable patients to be deprived of their right to informed consent about where they will live and the health care they receive,” the organizations said in the suit.

The government introduced and quickly passed Bill 7 last fall, allowing hospital placement coordinators to accept a spot in a long-term care home and share their health information without a patient's approval.

Doctors and nurses determine if a patient is well enough to be discharged out of the hospital, which is when they are designated to need an “alternate level of care.” Then a hospital placement coordinator can determine if a patient is eligible to be moved into a nursing home, can pick a home, send personal health information to a home and authorize admission to a home all without the consent of these patients.

Patients have no right to review or appeal the decisions made by the hospital, the organizations say.

The law does not allow hospitals to physically remove patients.

There are about 5,700 so-called ALC patients in hospitals across Ontario, but only about a third of those patients have been designated to go to a long-term care home.

The law also allows patients to be sent to nursing homes up to 70 kilometres from their preferred spot in southern Ontario and up to 150 kilometres away in northern Ontario.

The attorney general's office declined to comment, saying it would be inappropriate with the case before the court.

“There's a lot of pressure on people in hospital to be moved into homes that they don't want,” said Jane Meadus, a lawyer with the Advocacy Centre for theElderly who fights for the rights of those in long-term care homes, hospitals, and psychiatric facilities.

“These homes are often far away and they often are physically substandard homes.”

The suit alleges the new law violates two sections of the Charter. They argue it infringes on an individual's right to life, liberty and security under section seven of the Charter.

The bill deprives patients of their right to privacy “by allowing any placement coordinator or clinician to access and share an ALC's personal health information with any number of (long-term care) homes to which admission is being sought and with other care providers as well,” the suit alleges.

The organizations also argue the law violates section 15 of the Charter that guarantees the right of equality and protects against discrimination.

The organizations say the law unfairly punishes those 65 and older.

“They are being deprived of rights that every other hospital patient, and every other resident in Ontario for that matter, to consent to where they live, to consent to the treatment and care they're going to receive,” said Steven Shrybman, a lawyer who is working on the case for the advocacy groups.

“They alone are being singled out to be deprived of those rights simply because they're old and ill and require care.”

The organizations want the court to declare some provisions of the bill unconstitutional and invalidated.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published April 13, 2023.

_______________________________________________________

#elderlaw #elderabuse #conlaw #Charterrights #Canada #cdnpoli #seniors

Friday, May 6, 2022

Tips on How to return to Canada via a land border crossing without ArriveCan, COVID-19 Testing, or Disclosing Vaccine Status

 

How to return to Canada via a land border crossing without ArriveCan nor a quarantine... and your dignity intact

Source: Police on Guard https://policeonguard.ca

Returning to Canada from Florida and California

Border crossing: Rainbow Bridge

Date: Monday April 11th 1:30am

Duration: 45 min

Punishments or fines: None

Brief description of experience:

1. Pulled up to booth

   1. Where were you?

   2. How long?

   3. What reason?

   4. Bringing anything back?

   5. Why don't you have ArriveCan? 

       1.  I don’t consent to providing that information. The only document needed to enter Canada as a citizen is my passport.

   6. Are you vaccinated?

       1. I do not disclose my private medical information.

   7. Do you have a place to quarantine?

       1. Yes

   8. What is your address?

       1.  I do not have to provide that information. My passport is the only document I need to provide.

   9. Agent fills out yellow slip and sends me aside to speak with his supervisor.

   10. Supervisor and two border agents come out. Border agents search my car and supervisor proceeds to ask similar questions above.

   11. Why didn't you fill out ArriveCan?

       1. I don’t consent to providing that information. My passport is the only document needed.

   12. Why have you not had a Covid test done?

       1. I quoted section 14.1 of the Quarantine Act: 14 (1) Any qualified person authorized by the Minister may, to determine whether a traveller has a communicable disease or symptoms of one, use any screening technology authorized by the Minister that does not involve the entry into the traveller’s body of any instrument or other foreign body."

🙶Screening technology

  •  (1) Any qualified person authorized by the Minister may, to determine whether a traveller has a communicable disease or symptoms of one, use any screening technology authorized by the Minister that does not involve the entry into the traveller’s body of any instrument or other foreign body.

  • Marginal note:Refusal to be screened

    (2) If a traveller refuses to be screened with the screening technology and the person using it is not a screening officer or quarantine officer, the person shall immediately inform a screening officer or quarantine officer of the refusal.🙷

  13. Agent says there is a public health order in place that everyone entering the country has to comply with.

       1. In order for a mandate like this to be valid, it needs my consent to enter the contract. I do not consent to this mandate. This mandate is void because I do not consent.

  14. Public health officer was not on site. I am asked to provide my cell phone number in order for them to contact me.

       1. I refuse to provide any contact information. The only document and information I need to enter my country is my passport.

   15. Agent calls public health officer and has me speak with them.

       1. The ask me similar questions as above.

       2. I quoted the quarantine act 14.1 again and tell them that I do not have any symptoms and that is all they can do is screen me for Covid-19.

   16. Border Agent Supervisor says that I should quarantine for 14 days. He gives me two test kits for day 1 and day 8. He says I can do what I want with them, as they cannot could enforce anything once I leave.

Important notes:

1. Familiarize yourself with the inside page of your passport.

2. Understand section 14.1 of the Quarantine act.

3. Do not say more than you need to. Do not disclose any personal information like cell phone number or home address. Your passport is all that is needed.

4. Be respectful, but be firm and confident.

I thanked the border agent supervisor. He told me that he does not agree with everything that is happening, but it is their job to enforce whatever they are told to.

policeonguard.ca (https://policeonguard.ca/)

Wednesday, April 6, 2022

COVID-19 Vaccines Adverse Health Reports for Canada, Europe, UK and US, April 6, 2022

 

Author: Tracey Young. (April 6, 2022). COVID-19 Vaccines Adverse Health Reports for Canada, Europe, UK and US, April 6, 2022. Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety and Justice. Retrieved from: https://canadianadvocacycentre.blogspot.com/2022/04/covid-19-vaccines-adverse-health.html.

Canadian COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Health Reaction Statistics Update, to March 25, 2022

▶️43,105 AH

▶️8,924 Serious; 34,181 Non-serious AH

▶️319 deaths; 1,307 blood clot cases

▶️6,490 Special Interest AE’s; 1,971 Myocarditis/Pericarditis cases

▶️87% ⬆️ in COVID-19 cases since vaccines started in Canada 

Source: Government of Canada. Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada, up to March 25, 2022. https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/

________________________________________________

European Union- EudraVigilance Adverse Health Reactions to March 26, 2022


Source: Shilhavy. B. Health Impact News. Retrieved from: https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/42507-dead-3984978-injured-following-covid-vaccines-in-european-database-of-adverse-reactions/

________________________________________________

United Kingdom (UK) Yellow Card Reports for AstraZeneca; Pfizer; Moderna; Unspecified to March 23, 2022

▶️Total Reactions for #COVID19vaccines: 1,475,298

▶️Total Fatal Outcomes: 2,075

▶️Total Reports: 450,567

▶️Miscarriages: 787

Source: Government of the United Kingdom (UK). (2022). Coronavirus vaccine – weekly summary of Yellow Card reporting. Retrieved from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting.

________________________________________________

United States (US) VAERS COVID-19 Adverse Health Reactions to March 25, 2022

Adverse reactions: 1,205,753 Reports to March 25th

▶️26,396 Deaths;48,852 Disabled

▶️14,5781 Hospitalizations

▶️41,320 Severe Allergic reactions

▶️13,527 Heart attacks;6,256 Blood clots

▶️4,423 Miscarriages

▶️37,579 Myocarditis/Pericarditis;14,949 Bells Palsy

Source: Open VAERS. (2022). VAERS COVID Vaccine Data. Retrieved from: https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data.

Copyright © 2022.Tracey Young/Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety and Justice. All Rights Reserved.

________________________________________________

#healthsovereignty #COVID19 #COVID19vaccines #AdverseHealthEvents #Canada #cdnpoli #DutytoWarn #InformedConsent #NurembergCode #Bioethics #Ethics

Thursday, March 3, 2022

Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Health Reactions and Fatalities During Clinical Trial Phases to February 28, 2021

 

Author: Tracey Young. (March 3, 2022). Pfizer Adverse Health Reactions and Fatalities During Clinical Trial Phases to February 28, 2021. Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety and Justice. Retrieved from: https://canadianadvocacycentre.blogspot.com/2022/03/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-health.html.

In this article, I present the following:

■ Overview of PHMPT v FDA Legal Case which prompted disclosure of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine Adverse Health Reactions statistics, data and information

■ U.S. FDA Presentation on COVID-19 Vaccines in October 2020

■ Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Health Reactions of Special Interest

■ APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST 

■ Link to Pfizer's full report5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021

■ Fatality Statistics Out of Adverse Event Cases Reported During Clinical Trials


                   Source: Slide from FDA Presentation (Oct. 2020). Full reference below. 

Introduction

A group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency requested Pfizer's clinical trial data and information for their COVID-19 vaccine application from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under freedom of information legislation. When the FDA refused to provide it, they initiated legal action to force the disclosure of the vaccine-related information. 

Overview of PHMPT v FDA Legal Case

These two articles provide concise overviews of the legal case and decision that has led to the disclosure of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine Adverse Health reaction clinical trial data. Key highlights of the article are reported below.

Why a Judge Ordered FDA to Release Covid-19 Vaccine Data Pronto.

Siri, A. (Jan. 18, 2022). Bloomberg Law. Retrieved from: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law-and-business/why-a-judge-ordered-fda-to-release-covid-19-vaccine-data-pronto.

“In response to a Freedom of Information act request, the Food and Drug administration asked a federal judge for permission to make the public wait until the year 2096 to disclose all of the data and relied upon to license pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine.

“… after the vaccines licensure in August 2020, public health and medical professionals for transparency, a group of highly credentialed scientists submitted a FOIA request to the FDA for the data submitted by Pfizer. The scientists explained that, until all the data has produced a proper review cannot be conducted because missing even a single data set could throw off any analysis.

In response, the FDA produced nothing. Therefore in September 2021, the scientists represented by their attorneys at Siri and grimstad, sued the FDA demanding it produced this data by March 2022.

The agency originally estimated it would need to produce 329,000 pages, and asked the court for permission to produce just 500 pages per month, which would have taken 55 years. In its final brief to the court, the FDA admitted that the total page count was at least 451,000, but still sought permission to produce just 500 pages per month period meaning that it could have taken 75 years, when most Americans alive today would be dead, to fully publicly disclose this information.

U.S. District Judge Mark T. Pittman, Northern District of Texas, expressed dismay at the FDA's proposed rate of production. He found the duration requested by the FDA unreasonable, comparing it to the actions of totalitarian nations. As such, the judge on January 6th, 2022 ordered the FDA to produce at least 55, 000 pages per month.

In his ruling, the judge recognized that the release of this data is of paramount public importance and should be one of the FDA's highest priorities. He quoted James Madison as saying a “popular Government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a farce or a tragedy quote and John F Kennedy as explaining that a “nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”

Article #2

On January 7, 2022, "A federal judge in Texas on Thursday ordered the Food and Drug Administration to make public the data it relied on to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, imposing a dramatically accelerated schedule that should result in the release of all information within about eight months.

That’s roughly 75 years and four months faster than the FDA said it could take to complete a Freedom of Information Act request by a group of doctors and scientists seeking an estimated 450,000 pages of material about the vaccine.

The court “concludes that this FOIA request is of paramount public importance,” wrote U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman in Fort Worth, who was appointed to the bench by former President Donald Trump in 2019.

Rather than producing 500 pages a month — the FDA's proposed timeline — he ordered the agency to turn over 55,000 a month. That means all the Pfizer vaccine data should be public by the end of the summer rather than, say, the year 2097.

The Justice Department, which represented the FDA in the litigation, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday evening. Pfizer, not a party to the suit, also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Pittman in his order made clear that the FOIA request, even if burdensome, has to be a priority for the FDA.

Quoting from remarks made during the hearing before him on December 14, he wrote that “there may not be a ‘more important issue at the Food and Drug Administration . . . than the pandemic, the Pfizer vaccine, getting every American vaccinated," and assuring the public that the vaccine was not "'rush[ed] on behalf of the United States.'"

Source: Greene, J. (2022). ‘Paramount importance’: Judge orders FDA to hasten release of Pfizer vaccine docs. Reuters. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/paramount-importance-judge-orders-fda-hasten-release-pfizer-vaccine-docs-2022-01-07/.


U.S. FDA Presentation on COVID-19 Vaccines in October 2020

CBER Plans for Monitoring COVID-19 Vaccine Safety and Effectiveness

Source: Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (Oct. 22, 2020). Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee October 22, 2020 Meeting Presentation. Retrieved from: https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download.


Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Health Reactions of Special Interest

In the three months from the start of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine, there were 42,086 Adverse health reports with a total of 158,893 adverse reactions and 1,223 deaths reported up to February 28th, 2021.

APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST (AESI)   

                               

Note: I have only included page 1 & page 8 out of the full 8 pages listed from page 30-38. The full list of AESI's can be viewed at the link below. 

Link to Pfizer's Full Report

Pfizer. (2021). 5.3.6 CUMULATIVE ANALYSIS OF POST-AUTHORIZATION ADVERSE EVENT REPORTS OF PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) RECEIVED THROUGH 28-FEB-2021. Retrieved from: https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf.


Fatality Statistics Out of Cases Reported During Clinical Trials

➡️1,223 fatalities out of 42,086 Case reports = 2.9% post-Pfizer COVID19 vaccine Fatality rate in 3 months

➡️However, data shows 9,400 Unknown Case outcomes. It's possible there could have been higher post-vaccine fatalities that were not reported by Pfizer.


Copyright © 2022.Tracey Young/Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety and Justice. All Rights Reserved.

___________________________________________________

#Canada #cdnpoli #COVID19 #COVID19vaccines #DigitalID 

Tuesday, February 22, 2022

Canadian Politics: Motion for confirmation of the declaration of emergency - Passed, February 21, 2022

 

                                                            Photographer: Unknown 

Author: Tracey Young. (Feb. 22, 2022). Canadian Politics: Motion for confirmation of the declaration of emergency - Passed, February 21, 2022. Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety and Justice. Retrieved from: https://canadianadvocacycentre.blogspot.com/2022/02/canadian-politics-motion-for.html.

In this article, I present the following information:

Emergencies ActDeclaration of a public order emergency

 Governor General Mary May Simon: Proclamation Declaring a Public Order Emergency

 Motion to Parliament: Confirmation of the declaration of emergency

 Next Steps: Senators of Canada Vote on the Motion

 Liberal Party: How the Emergencies Act is Being Used

 Articles, Op-Eds & RCMP Statement

 Canadian COVID-19 Epidemiological Statistics for February 21st and February 22, 2022

 Canadian COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Health Reports to February 11, 2022


Introduction

On February 21, 2022 a historic vote was taken by Parliamentarians in Canada's House of Commons. For three weeks, Canadian Truckers had been protesting mandatory vaccinations ordered by the Liberal Party in Ottawa. Protests were also set up at borders and bridges. The Freedom Convoy has been protesting to end vaccine mandates in Canada. 

On February 14, 2022, Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister, invoked the Emergencies Act (1985) for the first time in Canadian history to shut down Canadians' exercise of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982) to protest about the vaccine mandates for truckers and all Canadians. 

Scenes of aggression and police brutality have been viewed all over the world. Many legal experts and lawyers dispute that the Liberal government met the legal threshold to invoke the Emergencies Act ("EA"). Several organizations have announced they will initiate legal action over what many are calling an "over-reach" of power by the Trudeau government. 

To further muddy the waters, and complicate the vote, word went out that the vote on the motion to invoke the EA would also be considered a vote of confidence in Trudeau, as Prime Minister. If the motion lost, the government would have fallen and Canada would have gone to another election. 

In the end, as they were predicted to do, the NDP voted with the Liberal party and the motion to support the invocation of the Emergencies Act was passed 185to 151. Little is known about how far the Liberal government will take this unprecedented and unwarranted power grab. 


Emergencies ActDeclaration of a public order emergency

  •  (1) When the Governor in Council believes, on reasonable grounds, that a public order emergency exists and necessitates the taking of special temporary measures for dealing with the emergency, the Governor in Council, after such consultation as is required by section 25, may, by proclamation, so declare.

  • Marginal note:Contents

    (2) A declaration of a public order emergency shall specify

    • (a) concisely the state of affairs constituting the emergency;

    • (b) the special temporary measures that the Governor in Council anticipates may be necessary for dealing with the emergency; and

    • (c) if the effects of the emergency do not extend to the whole of Canada, the area of Canada to which the effects of the emergency extend.

Marginal note:Effective date

  •  (1) A declaration of a public order emergency is effective on the day on which it is issued, but a motion for confirmation of the declaration shall be laid before each House of Parliament and be considered in accordance with section 58.

  • Marginal note:Expiration of declaration

    (2) A declaration of a public order emergency expires at the end of thirty days unless the declaration is previously revoked or continued in accordance with this Act.

  • Link: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-4.5/page-1.html#h-213927

  • Emergencies Act (1985). Retrieved from: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/e-4.5/page-1.html#h-213927.


Governor General Mary May Simon: Proclamation Declaring a Public Order Emergency

Canada Gazette, Part II, Volume 156, Extra Number 1

Registration
SOR/2022-20 February 15, 2022

EMERGENCIES ACT

A Proclamation

Whereas the Governor in Council believes, on reasonable grounds, that a public order emergency exists and necessitates the taking of special temporary measures for dealing with the emergency;

Whereas the Governor in Council has, before declaring a public order emergency and in accordance with subsection 25(1) of the Emergencies Act, consulted the Lieutenant Governor in Council of each province, the Commissioners of Yukon and the Northwest Territories, acting with consent of their respective Executive Councils, and the Commissioner of Nunavut;

Now Know You that We, by and with the advice of Our Privy Council for Canada, pursuant to subsection 17(1) of the Emergencies Act, do by this Our Proclamation declare that a public order emergency exists throughout Canada and necessitates the taking of special temporary measures for dealing with the emergency;

And We do specify the emergency as constituted of... 

Link: https://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2022/2022-02-15-x1/html/sor-dors20-eng.html


Motion to Parliament: Confirmation of the declaration of emergency

SUBJECT

Motion for confirmation of the declaration of emergency

VOTE NO. 32; 44TH PARLIAMENT, 1ST SESSION

Sitting No. 36 - Monday, February 21, 2022

Link: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/votes/44/1/32

Motion Sponsor:

Hon. Marco Mendicino

See the published vote in the Journals of February 21, 2022

Link: 

SUMMARY

Results: Agreed To 

Yea: 185

Nay: 151

Paired: 0

Total: 336

VOTE DETAILS

Visit the link to see how Members of Parliament (MP's) voted. 

Link: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/votes/44/1/32


Next Steps: Senators of Canada Vote on the Motion

The Motion now goes to the Senate of Canada for their vote. There are currently 105 Senators. 

Link: https://sencanada.ca

Read more about the Senators:

Link: https://sencanada.ca/en/senators/


Liberal Party: How the Emergencies Act is Being Used

Financial Instruments: Banks Can Freeze Bank Accounts & Credit 

Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister, details how some Emergencies Act powers, particularly "financial instruments," will be made permanent. (Feb. 18, 2022).

Link: https://twitter.com/inklessPW/status/1494752731441123328


Alberta is Filing a Court Challenge to the Emergencies Act

Jason Kenney, Premier of Alberta, February 19, 2022: 

"Alberta is filing a Court challenge to the unjustified use of the Emergencies Act. We may also intervene in support of other Court challenges.

As Tommy Douglas said about the use of the War Measures Act in 1970, it’s like “using a sledgehammer to crack a peanut."

Link: https://twitter.com/jkenney/status/1495172077879369731

Alberta will launch a Court challenge of the Trudeau government’s invocation of the Emergencies Act, because it is: - unnecessary - disproportionate - violates natural justice - intrudes into provincial jurisdiction - creates a dangerous precedent.

Link: https://twitter.com/jkenney/status/1495153369538723843


Mark Gerretsen, Liberal MP Reports Use of Financial Aspects of EA Use (Feb. 19, 2022)

The Emergencies Act has allowed: - The freezing of 113 financial products - The disclosure of 47 entities - 251 Bitcoin addresses have been shared with virtual currency exchangers - One financial institution freezing the account of a payment processor to a value of $3.8M

Link: https://twitter.com/MarkGerretsen/status/1495217171177349120


Parliamentary Debate on the Motion, February 21, 2022

Candice Bergen, Interim leader of the Conservative party, asks Trudeau what power is needed right now under the Emergencies Act that doesn't exist under current Canadian law. Post Millenial. Twitter.

Link: https://twitter.com/TPostMillennial/status/1495843824450650112


Articles, Op-Eds & RCMP Statement

OPINION: Canadian lawyers urge rejection of Emergencies Act

Toronto Sun. (Feb. 21, 2022). Retrieved from: https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/opinion-canadian-lawyers-urge-rejection-of-emergencies-act.

RCMP Statement on the freezing of bank accounts

Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP). 

February 21, 2022 - Ottawa, Canada

Under the Emergency Economic Measures Order (Emergencies Act), the list that was provided to financial institutions included identities of individuals who were influencers in the illegal protest in Ottawa, and owners and/or drivers of vehicles who did not want to leave the area impacted by the protest. At no time, did we provide a list of donors to financial institutions.

We are now working with the banks to build a process to address the accounts that were frozen.

Link: https://blockade.rcmp.ca/news-nouvelles/ncr-rcn211130-s-d-en.html

Bergen Statement: Bergen Reacts to Vote on Emergency Measures: Tables Motion to Revoke (Feb. 21, 2022)


Breaking: Trudeau will retain Emergency Powers

Bexte, K. (Feb. 21, 2022). The Countersignal. Retrieved from: https://www.thecountersignal.com/news/trudeau-will-retain-power.

Emergencies Act passes crucial House of Commons vote with NDP support: Motion affirming Emergencies Act passes House by vote of 185 to 151

Major, D. (Feb. 21, 2022). CBC News. Retrieved  from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-emergencies-act-vote-1.6359243.


Canadian COVID-19 Epidemiological Statistics for February 21 and February 22, 2022

          

Source: Government of Canada. (Feb. 21 and Feb.22, 2022). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Epidemiology update. Retrieved from: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html.


Canadian COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Health Reports to February 11, 2022

Source: Government of Canada. Reported side effects following COVID-19 vaccination in Canada, up to February 11, 2022. https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/vaccine-safety/

Copyright © 2022.Tracey Young/Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety and Justice. All Rights Reserved.

___________________________________________________

#Canada #cdnpoli #COVID19 #DigitalID #GreatReset #4thIndustrialRevolution 

Canada: COVID-19 Cases and Adverse Health Reaction Statistics for COVID-19 Vaccines to October 7, 2023

  COVID-19 Cases in Canada to October 4, 2023 ▶️  Dec. 14, 2020: 460,743 COVID-19 Cases in Canada ▶️  Vaccines started being administered i...