Tuesday, November 17, 2020

Election Laws & Democracy in BC: Who is in Currently in Charge of the BC Government?

Author: Tracey Young, Nov. 17, 2020. Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety & Justice

Introduction

Much confusion is swirling around in B.C. regarding our current political situation, and who is in charge of running the B.C. government. I will attempt to clarify some of this, although many details remain murky. 

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. I am a public interest advocate, writer, and publisher. I will provide a brief introduction to legislation regarding elections and how parliamentary democracy works in B.C to assist people in understanding how Members of the Legislature (MLA's) are elected, and become Parliamentarians. 

I will also provide an analysis of what I understand about who is currently in charge of the B.C. government. This is only an analysis. There may be additional details that I am not currently aware of at the present time when I'm writing this article. I will update and/or edit this article should I receive additional information from credible sources. 

The 41st Parliament and BC Legislature Was Dissolved

On September 21st, 2020, the 41st Parliament in B.C. was dissolved when Lieutenant Governor, Janet Austin, accepted Premier John Horgan's request to call an election for October 24th, 2020. 

When the Lieutenant Governor of B.C. accepted the election call request, pursuant to the Constitution Act and Election Act of B.C., this led to the dissolution of the B.C. Legislature. The impact of that includes the following: 

1. It ended the 41st Parliament of B.C. All business of the House came to a close. This call ended all government Steering committees and legislative work that had been ongoing, including any Bills that were still in progress. 

2. All Members of the Legislature (MLA's) who had been elected in 2017 to form the 41st Parliament ceased to become MLA's because the Legislature was dissolved.  

3. The impact of this election call is that B.C. no longer had any more Ministers of the Crown by law. There was also no longer a BCNDP Executive Cabinet. However, as of today's date, November 17, 2020, the B.C. government continues to provide a link to a website that lists the previous BCNDP cabinet and their respective Ministerial assignments. Some of those individuals did not run in the 42nd election. 

The Ministerial and Premier's email addresses listed for these individuals are not currently operational. 

4. The constituencies of each MLA were dissolved and their offices were supposed to be closed, because the MLA no longer represented the people in their ridings due to the dissolution of the B.C. Legislature. 

Seven members of the BCNDP Cabinet Executive announced they would not be running for office again. Its become a lot more clear why people may have made that proactive decision in light of what's currently happening, and events that will unfold in the future. 

These individuals are all still listed as Cabinet Ministers on the B.C. government website even though they are no longer MLA's. Their former Ministries no longer have Ministers appointed as members of Cabinet. 

There appears to be some sort of exception -- Carole James, former Minister of Finance, who did not run in this election, who was reportedly asked to play some sort of caretaker and oversight role until the next government was sworn in. 

Sources: B.C. Government. Executive Council of the B.C. Government: Cabinet Ministers of B.C. Retrieved from: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/governments/organizational-structure/cabinet/cabinet-ministers.

Carrigg, D. (2020) Seventh B.C. NDP cabinet minister calls it quits as possible election looms. Vancouver Sun. Retrieved from: https://vancouversun.com/news/sixth-b-c-ndp-cabinet-minister-calls-it-quits-as-election-looms. 

Harnett, C. (2020). Until final results are in, machinery of government continues in caretaker mode. Times Colonist. Retrieved from: https://www.timescolonist.com/news/local/until-final-results-are-in-machinery-of-government-continues-in-caretaker-mode-1.24226798.

How Government Work Continues During a Provincial Election in B.C. 

Having been a direct B.C. government employee during previous elections, what generally happens after an election call, and prior to Elections BC confirming the final votes, is that the "wheels of government," and the day-to-day business of running the existing Ministries under the previous Parliament, continues to be managed by the bureaucracy. This is primarily Deputy Ministers, and other executive level bureaucrats in each ministry. 

In the 2020 Election, there appears to have been a change to the way things usually function during an election, and prior to the swearing in of the new MLA's and party which will form a minority, or majority government in the next Parliament. In this case, this will be the 42nd Parliament. The changes that have occurred in this election will be outlined below. 

Elections Act and the Constitution Act of B.C.

There are two key pieces of legislation in B.C. which govern the rule of law with respect to elections, Parliament and the Legislature -- the Elections Act of B.C. and the Constitution Act of B.C. I will outline core elements of both which are important to understanding, and contextualizing the current actions of the B.C. government, and particularly John Horgan and Adrian Dix. 

Constitution Act of B.C.

This Act articulates, defines, and gives definition to Parliament and the Legislature in B.C. It defines who is legally considered to be Members of the Legislature, what is an Executive Council, and how these individuals become members through election. 

Executive Council

(1)The Executive Council is composed of the persons the Lieutenant Governor appoints, including the Premier of British Columbia, who is president of the Executive Council.

(2)The Lieutenant Governor in Council must from among those persons appointed under subsection (1) designate


(a)those officials with portfolio and must designate the portfolio for each official, and

(b)those officials without portfolio.


17  There must be in British Columbia a Legislative Assembly constituted as provided by this Act, and the Lieutenant Governor has the power, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly, to make laws in and for British Columbia in all cases, subject to the Constitution Act, 1867, and to the order of Her late Majesty in Council.

 

Members represent electoral districts

18 (1)For returning members of the Legislative Assembly, there are to be the number of electoral districts established by the Electoral Districts Act, with the names, boundaries and areas determined in the manner provided for by the Electoral Boundaries Commission Act.

 

(2)The Legislative Assembly consists of the members elected in the manner provided for by the Election Act.

(3)A member represents the electoral district for which the member was elected.


General elections

23 (1)The Lieutenant Governor may, by proclamation in Her Majesty's name, prorogue or dissolve the Legislative Assembly when the Lieutenant Governor sees fit.

 

(2)Subject to subsection (1), a general voting day must occur on the third Saturday in October in the fourth calendar year following the general voting day for the most recently held general election.

Oath of allegiance

24 (1) A member of the Legislative Assembly must not vote or sit until he or she has taken and subscribed the following oath before the Lieutenant Governor, or some other person authorized by the Lieutenant Governor to administer the oath:

"I, A.B., swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II [or her successor], her heirs and successors, according to law. So help me God."

Conditions that must be met to be appointed as a Member of Executive Council and a Minister of the Crown in B.C.

This Act clearly establishes that in order to be considered a member of the Legislature, Executive Council and appointed as a Minister in a current Parliament several conditions must be met: 

1. A general election took place in B.C. during a particular time frame -- from dissolution of Parliament to a specific date for voting and the polls being closed. 

2. Writs of election must be returned by Elections BC. This ends the election period. 

3. Final vote count results are announced by Elections BC. The successful candidates, by vote, are also confirmed to have been elected in a specific electoral district. 

4. An individual must swear an Oath of allegiance to the Crown (represented by the Lieutenant Governor) prior to sitting as a Member of the Legislature (MLA). 

5. The Lieutenant Governor must appoint and designate the Premier, who becomes President of the Executive Council and Cabinet. 

6. The Lieutenant Governor must appoint, designate, and assign MLA's to Executive Council portfolios (Ministries). They become Ministers of the Crown upon this official appointment. 

Elections BC and the October 24th Election for the 42nd Parliament in B.C.

Elections BC is the statutory agency in BC that is responsible for:

  • conducting provincial elections;

  • counting ballots; 

  • declaring final counts; and 

  • confirming the candidates who were elected by winning the most votes in their electoral districts in our "First Past the Post" (FPTP) electoral system. 
As noted above, these confirmed candidates will become Members of the Legislature (MLA's) and will form the next Parliament once they are sworn in by the Lieutenant Governor. They are required to swear an Oath of allegiance, pursuant to the Constitution Act prior to becoming Parliamentarians. 

The MLA's elected and sworn in after winning their electoral ridings in the 2020 provincial election will form the 42nd Parliament in B.C. They will be members of the B.C. Legislature for the next four years. 

The 2020 provincial election broke records for having one of the lowest voter turnouts in B.C. history. Approximately only 52.4% of registered voters showed up to cast ballots. This was the lowest electoral participation rate since 1928. 

The people of B.C. and democracy were the losers in this "pandemic election." This will become quite clear as the BCNDP comes together to form the next government -- as a majority this time. 

Source: Larsen, K. (2020). B.C. election turnout sinks to all-time low. CBC News. Retrieved from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/b-c-election-turnout-sinks-to-all-time-low-1.5777084.

Elections Act of B.C.

This Act articulates how elections take place in B.C. Key aspects of this legislation include the following:

Order for a general election

24 (1)For a general election to be held, the Lieutenant Governor in Council must issue an order under this section that

(a)directs the chief electoral officer to issue writs of election for all electoral districts,

(b)sets the date of issue for the writs of election, which must be the same for all writs,

(c)specifies the general voting day for the election in accordance with section 27 of this Act and section 23 of the Constitution Act, and

(d)directs that the writs of election be returned in accordance with this Act.

Election called when writ of election issued

26 (1)On receiving an order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council under section 24 or 25, the chief electoral officer must

(a)issue the writ or writs of election in accordance with the order,

(b)transmit each writ to the district electoral officer to whom it is addressed, and

(c)arrange for the writ or writs to be published in the Gazette.


(2)A writ of election must be substantially in the form of Form 1 as set out in the Schedule to this Act and must include the following:

(a)the dates for the start and end of the nomination period for nominations under section 56;

(b)the date of general voting day for the election;

(c)the day for the return of the writ, being the date on or before which the district electoral officer is to certify to the chief electoral officer the name of the individual elected as member of the Legislative Assembly.

(3)For the purposes of this Act, an election is called when the writ for the election is issued in accordance with the applicable order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council under section 24 or 25.

The Elections BC website states the following on its page, Preliminary Voting Results:

"Final voting results will not be available until after the conclusion of final count. The timing of final count will be announced as soon as possible following the completion of initial count."

They also state the following: 

  • During all voting opportunities, there were also an estimated 85,000 certification envelopes containing absentee ballots cast across the province. 

  • As of 8:00pm October 24, 2020 an estimated 525,000 vote-by-mail voting packages have been received. This does not include any vote-by-mail packages that have been dropped off at district electoral offices or voting places. 
  • Absentee and vote-by-mail ballots are counted at final count.

  • During preparation for final count, district electoral officers will confirm voting results and certification envelope counts from absentee and vote-by-mail voting that was reported during initial count. 

  • Adjustments may be made to accurately reflect election night results, and the screening of certification envelopes. 

  • Results will not be finalized until final count is completed.

(Source: https://electionsbcenr.blob.core.windows.net/electionsbcenr/GE-2020-10-24.html). 

Update from Elections BC About Final Ballot Counting

On November 8th, 2020, Elections BC announced the final ballot count in the October 24th election. The final voting results are found at the link below for each riding in B.C. You can view the number of votes each candidate received in each of the constituencies in the province. 

Source: 2020 Provincial General Election. Final Voting Results. Retrieved from: https://electionsbcenr.blob.core.windows.net/electionsbcenr/GE-2020-10-24_Candidate.html.

Who is Currently in Charge in B.C. 

This is where things get murky. My analysis is that -- according to the Constitution Act, there is currently no government that is legally in charge in B.C. It remains the bureaucracy that are running day-to-day operations in B.C. As noted above, Carole James is also playing some unclear role over this last couple of months since the writ of election was dropped, and the B.C. Legislature was dissolved. 

Elections BC provides a helpful page, "Key Election Dates," which outlines a timeline for the 42nd election. 

They identified Monday, November 16 to Tuesday, November 17th, 2020 as "Return Day" stating the following explanation for this: 

"Writs of election are returned to the Chief Electoral Officer, ending the election period. For most electoral districts, the writs of election will be returned on November 16 or 17, depending on when they finished final count. The writ in West Vancouver-Sea to Sky will be returned following the conclusion of a judicial recount in that electoral district."

Source. Elections BC. Key Election Dates. Retrieved from: https://elections.bc.ca/provincial-elections/key-election-dates/.

John Horgan and Adrian Dix Representing Themselves As MLA's, Members of the Executive Council, and Premier and Cabinet Minister

Prior to the final ballot votes being completed, the writs of election being returned, and successful candidates in each riding being announced and confirmed by Elections BC, John Horgan, and Adrian Dix, have both been publicly identifying themselves, respectively as "Premier," and "Minister of Health." 

These claims were also advanced by several members of the B.C. media, who repeatedly referred to them in these official roles on social media, and in various media outlets in B.C.  

Mr. Dix has been involved in numerous public updates and interviews about COVID-19, representing himself to the people of B.C. as the Minister of Health during the time period when ballots were still being counted, and before the election results were finalized, and confirmed by Elections BC.

Mr. Dix has refused to respond to my public questions about why he was presenting himself in this way during the period of time when Parliament is currently dissolved, the election was still in progress, and prior to him being sworn in as a MLA in the 42nd Parliament. I attempted to email him as well, and did not receive a reply from him, or any constituency assistants, because this office no longer exists.  

Mr. Horgan has also refused to answer my public questions to him about why he has been calling himself Premier prior to the final ballot count and announcement confirming the final ballot count and election results from Election BC. Mr. Horgan has been heavily involved in public relations (PR) activities on social media, through various media outlets, and representing himself as "Premier Horgan" to the public in these forums. 

Mr. Horgan also sent out social media posts announcing his re-election, and received many public congratulatory messages before the election was officially concluded.  

The B.C. government has not provided any announcements about Mr. Horgan, or Mr. Dix being re-elected, being sworn in by the Lieutenant Governor, or being assigned their respective official roles as Premier, and Minister of Health. 

However, on October 26th, 2020, two days after voting was finished the Premier's Office, provided a written statement from "Premier John Horgan," acknowledging Andrew Wilkinson's resignation as Opposition leader." Numerous other media releases have been released under the name of "Premier John Horgan" from the Premier's Office. 

Sources: B.C. Government. (2020). Premier's statement on Andrew Wilkinson's resignation as Opposition leader. Retrieved from: https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2020PREM0089-001893.

B.C. Government. (2020). Office of the Premier. Retrieved from: https://news.gov.bc.ca/office-of-the-premier.

Writs of Election Have Not Been Returned Yet in B.C.

In a CBC article dated, November 9th, 2020, Mr. Horgan is referred to as Premier. The following statements were attributed to him in this story: 

"Horgan focused on issues related to the pandemic during the conference, but also confirmed he spoke with Lt.-Gov Janet Austin on Sunday at which point she asked him to form government — an exchange officially kick-starting the NDP's second term

The premier said he hopes to announce his new cabinet picks in the weeks ahead with the goal of bringing the legislature back before Christmas, though the rising number of COVID-19 cases is hampering the ability to bring politicians together to swear them in as MLAs and, for some, as new cabinet members."

Source: Schmunk, B. (2020). B.C. risks return to severe pandemic restrictions if cases don't come down, premier says. CBC News. Retrieved from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/john-horgan-bc-covid-19-1.5795551

In a media article, dated November 13th, 2020, Richard Zussman of Global Media, speculated on who would be appointed to the new BCNDP Cabinet. Key details outlined in this article included the following:

"B.C. Premier John Horgan has secured his majority government and now he is building his cabinet.

The expectation is a cabinet will be announced before the end of November.

The positions that have been left open are finance, jobs, transportation, social development, mental health and addictions, Indigenous relations and forests, lands and natural resources. [These were the portfolios vacated from the seven Cabinet ministers who did not seek election again]. 

Horgan also needs to decide whether he wants to add positions to his cabinet. The current cabinet has 23 people, but with a larger caucus and an intense focus on COVID-19, there could be a few more positions added.

The government is folding child care into the minister of Education...

One of the things the premier could be looking at is putting a minister in charge of COVID-19 recovery. The position could merge together responsibilities from numerous ministries in order to provide a unified voice communicating decisions made about the pandemic response."

Legal Action Against John Horgan for Calling an Election

In October 2020, Integrity BC and Democracy Watch, public interest advocacy groups, filed a legal action in B.C. Supreme Court against Premier John Horgan. 

In their complaint, they alleged that, by calling the election prior to the date outlined by law, Premier Horgan violated the Constitution Act. They were not seeking to stop the 42nd election, but they are seeking a declaration and an order that Premier John Horgan's actions violated the fixed election dates articulated in the Act. 

A CBC article quotes the complainants in this legal action: 

Duff Conacher, Democracy Watch, stated: "By calling a snap election during a pandemic instead of waiting for the fixed election date a year from now, Premier Horgan acted like an old-school power-crazed politician, not a new democrat committed to fair and democratic elections.”

Integrity B.C. founder Wayne Crookes says "Horgan's snap election call was self-interested, hypocritical and unfair.

It violates the fixed election date measures in B.C.'s constitution that the NDP has publicly supported, and the written agreement that the NDP had with the Green Party, and the good democratic tradition of fixed elections every four years that has developed through the past four B.C. elections," he said.

In speaking to this legal action, the following details were quoted in the Times Colonist:

“A spokesman for John Horgan said a statement would be coming Monday afternoon but it had not been received by deadline. He said in an email the Constitution Act “is pretty clear on the issue,” including the section 23(1) which says the Lieutenant-governor may dissolve the Legislature when she “sees fit.” 

Sources: CBC News. (2020) Advocacy groups file lawsuit against John Horgan's snap election call. Retrieved from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/advocacy-groups-file-lawsuit-against-john-horgan-s-snap-election-call-1.5775123.

Lazaruk, S. (2020). B.C. snap election was illegal, says Democracy Watch as it prepares lawsuit, Times Colonist. Retrieved from: https://www.timescolonist.com/news/b-c/b-c-snap-election-was-illegal-says-democracy-watch-as-it-prepares-lawsuit-1.24223513.

Conclusion

Various candidates in the 42nd B.C. election have publicly confirmed the following information via social media posts:

1. The BC Legislature remains dissolved.

2. There are currently no Members of the Legislature (MLA's). 

3. Successful candidates (by voting results from Elections BC) have not yet been sworn in as MLA's by the Lieutenant Governor.

4. That the final writs of election are expected shortly, perhaps today, November 17th. 

5. That they have not yet been informed when they will be sworn in as MLA's to form the 42nd Parliament and represent voters in the B.C. Legislature. 

This article may not have cleared up the murky nature of what has happened during this 42nd B.C. election. It also has not confirmed who is really in charge of the B.C. government from a political standpoint. However, this article has provided an overview and details regarding election and constitutional laws in B.C governing elections and parliamentary matters to educate and inform interested voters and members of the public.  

I have also presented information regarding Mr. Horgan and Mr. Dix as they continue to present themselves as representatives of the Executive Council and Cabinet in B.C. via public relations and communications activities on social media and through various media outlets in the province. I suspect there will be more to write about all of this, and many other topics related to governance and leadership in B.C., in the days to come. 

Monday, November 9, 2020

Advocacy & Legal: Procedural Fairness & Fundamental Justice: Sec. 7 of Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms


Author: Tracey Young. (Nov. 9, 2020). Advocacy & Legal: Procedural Fairness & Fundamental Justice: Sec. 7 of Canadian Charter of Rights & Freedoms. Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety and Justice. Retrieved from: https://canadianadvocacycentre.blogspot.com/2020/11/advocacy-legal-procedural-fairness.html.

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. I'm providing this article for informational and advocacy purposes only. If you believe your constitutional and civil rights have been violated when dealing with governmental and public sector organizations, determine what the policies and procedures are for filing complaints with the body you feel has treated you unfairly. You may also want to seek legal consultation to determine if your Charter rights have been violated, and what you can do about this. 

Section 7: Life, liberty and security of the person

Provision

7. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

Purpose

Section 7 of the Charter requires that laws or state actions that interfere with life, liberty and security of the person conform to the principles of fundamental justice — the basic principles that underlie our notions of justice and fair process (Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)[2007] 1 SCR 350 at paragraph 19).

Source: Government of Canada, Department of Justice. Section 7: Life, liberty and security of the person. Charterpedia. Retrieved from: https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art7.html.

Procedural Fairness

The Court outlined a non-exhaustive list of factors that determine the content of procedural fairness owed in individual cases.  Those factors repeatedly continue to be recognized by the Supreme Court of Canada. In Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Vavilov the Court listed these factors as including:

  1. the nature of the decision being made and the process followed in making it;
  2. the nature of the statutory scheme;
  3. the importance of the decision to the individual or individuals affected;
  4. the legitimate expectations of the person challenging the decision; and
  5. the choices of procedure made by the administrative decision maker itself.

The Court in Baker also stated that in certain circumstances, the duty of fairness requires a written explanation for a decision.

Source: Kootnekoff, S. (2020). The Duty of Procedural Fairness. Inspire Law. Retrieved from: https://www.inspirelaw.ca/the-duty-of-procedural-fairness/.

The Principles of Fundamental Justice: What are they Anyway?

Centre for Constitutional Studies, University of Alberta Law. 

Link: https://ualawccsprod.srv.ualberta.ca/2019/11/the-principles-of-fundamental-justice-what-are-they-anyway

Colton Fehr, sessional instructor and PhD candidate at the Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, will tell you how the vague sounding “principles of fundamental justice” in Section 7 of the Charter have been used by the courts to effect change with respect to controversial social policy issues, including the regulation of sex work, euthanasia, and abortion.

Video: Downtown Charter Series: Principles of Fundamental Justice: What are they Anyway?


Copyright © 2020-2021.Tracey Young/Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety and Justice. All Rights Reserved.

Sunday, November 8, 2020

Health: COVID19 Update for Canadian Statistics - November 8th, 2020

Government of Canada (Public Health Agency of Canada) report the following:

November 8th, 2020 (statistics from Nov. 7th)

- 2.5% + rate for 9+ million #Canadians tested

- 0.7% of population; 82% recovery rate

- 7% hospitalization rate for 10 months

4% #CaseFatalityRate (# of deaths/cases)

- 0.1% Active cases in #Canadian population #Canada

Source: Government of Canada. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (#COVID19): Epidemiology Update. Retrieved from: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html


Friday, October 16, 2020

Response to 'Open Letter Regarding "Freedom Rally" This Weekend distributed by the Vancouver District Labour Council (VDLC), dated October 15, 2020

October 16, 2020 

My name is Tracey Young, MSW, RSW. I am the CEO of the Canadian Advocacy Centre for Health, Safety & Justice. I am a former delegate of the Vancouver District Labour Council (VDLC), and a former trade union activist. 

After more than 25 years as a civil and human rights activist in BC, I remain committed to Canadian values of civil and human rights, democracy, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This includes their right to exercise those rights and freedoms as a hallmark of living in a democratic nation, and in a civil society. 

With great alarm, and shock, I received a letter, signed by numerous misguided individuals, elected officials, "leaders" and organizations in BC that has been organized, circulated and distributed by the VDLC. This letter has deceived, misconstrued, and manipulated signatories, the public, and members of various organizations about the purpose of the "BC Freedom Mega Rally," scheduled to take place on October 17th and October 18th in Vancouver, B.C. 

This letter contains numerous false narratives, incorrect and deceptive information, and appears to be a malicious attempt to subvert and disseminate propaganda and disinformation about this event, those who plan to attend this event, or those who have attended these marches and rallies in the past. This response letter will provide factual information in an attempt to address the disinformation being propagated and disseminated by the VDLC, and President Stephen von Sychowski, who is the primary signatory of this letter. 

See the letter here on the VDLC website: http://www.vdlc.ca/open_letter_regarding_freedom_rally

Fact 1: Numerous marches and rallies have been held throughout 2020 in response to the draconian, disruptive, and unwarranted violation of the constitutional, civil and human rights of citizens in BC, pursuant to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

These marches have occurred under different names, themes, and reasons. Some of these include: Ending the "lockdowns," and forced closure of businesses by the BCNDP government, and the destruction of local economies. Themes have included the loss of jobs, and concerns about the future of the BC economy and BC communites. Larger concerns have also been noted about the "Great Reset" that is ongoing, and is transforming every aspect of society in Canada, and globally. 

Other themes include concerns about vaccinations, and plans that are unfolding with regard to the dangerous fast tracking of COVID-19 vaccines. Many of the ongoing vaccine trials have been stopped due to severe illnesses and reactions the human guinea pigs being used to test them have experienced. These are evidence-based facts.  

Concerns about the use of COVID-19 vaccines in Canada are warranted. This has been made a legitimate and real concern when elected and appointed public officials, including Justin Trudeau, Premier John Horgan, Adrian Dix, former Minister of Health, and Dr. Bonnie Henry, BC's Provincial Health Officer, have all repeatedly signaled, in the provincial and national media stories, that the citizens of BC will continue to have their lives, and participation in society, disrupted, interfered with,and restricted by governments until COVID-19 vaccines are available, and widely administered to Canadians. I do not accept, or agree with those positions, nor should any other Canadian. 

Canada has a disgraceful history of using non-consenting individuals, including First Nations people, and children, as human experiments by governments who wanted to conduct "scientific research" on topics of interest to them. It is no "conspiracy theory" or "anti-vaxxer" concern that corporations and other entities all over the world are fast-tracking vaccines to get them to market, including forgoing human testing. 

Additionally, many of the Big Pharma corporations involved in COVID-19 vaccine development have histories of causing harm to test subjects, and others, and have been successfully sued for the vaccine injuries and harms they have caused to recipients of their vaccines. These corporations have been ordered to pay billions in damages by courts all over the world. Other Big Pharma corporations have no previous history of developing vaccines. Yet, they are fast-tracking, and skipping evidence-based scientific research phases, and crucial steps in their zeal to capitalize on stakeholder, and corporate profits. 

Fact 2: These marches and rallies have included a wide range of participants and groups, with a diverse set of interests, beliefs, and causes they support. This is no different than the wide "tent" that the "progressive" movement in BC, and Canada, sees at its demonstration, marches, or rallies. 

In my years of attending various demos, or rallies that included individuals and members of various groups, and organizations I have not always been in agreement, or aligned with the perspectives that have been advanced, or promoted by others, including those in the trade union movement. Such is life -- and free speech in a democracy. I did not attempt to "cancel" these individuals. 

The newly formed and forming civil rights and liberties groups coming together across Canada to signal their commitment, advocacy, and support for the civil and democratic rights of all Canadians is actually much the same as the diverse, inclusive, and wide range of individuals and groups involved in the social justice and "progressive" movements that the trade union movement has also collaborated with. This overlap is even directly stated in the VDLC letter:  "... a handful could be spotted hanging around the edges of climate and social justice events" (page 2). 

Fact 3: The efforts to malign this civil rights and liberty movement as being "far right" is a deceitful, defamatory, manipulative and unconstitutional act that is aimed to "cancel," silence, and subvert the civil rights of Canadians to exercise their constitutional rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

The letter provides a mealy-mouthed nod to these rights, while also gaslighting them away. This is not dissimilar to abusers who use language to deceive, degrade, disarm, and manipulate their targets and victims.  

After being subjected to numerous experiences of violations of my free speech from government representatives, and on social media, (exercising my Charter right to Freedom of Expression), I wrote an article about these rights, and the increasing limitations and undermining of these rights in Canada. I suggest that the signatories and groups listed in the VDLC letter read this. The article can be found here: 

Freedom of Speech and Expression in Canada: Civil Rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Fact 4: All of the Vancouver demos, marches, and rallies have been organized in coordination with the Vancouver Police Department by those who have been the organizers. There has been an excellent working relationship and collaboration between the individuals, and organizations involved. Efforts to defame and pathologize those involved in organizing these events as "dangerous" repudiate the collegial relationship between VPD and this "movement." 

For instance, at every single demo, or march, the organizers, and many of the speakers thank the VPD. They also encourage the crowd to give them a round of applause for the important work they're doing. This crowd is not the ones calling for "defunding the police." Individuals and groups who attend respect and honour the rule of law in Vancouver, and elsewhere. They also appreciate the VPD's work and efforts to keep these demos and marches safe for them, and others. Organizers and others also do not hesitate to reach out to, and engage with the VPD, if they have questions about matters related to community events. 

Fact 5: Members of the Vancouver Police Department, employees and representatives of the City of Vancouver, have been in attendance, and have provided escort for every demo, march, and rally that these individuals and groups have held in 2020.

Fact 6: Members of the VPD are well informed, and respectful of the constitutional rights of all individuals and groups in Canada to exercise their Charter rights, including Freedom of Association and Freedom of Assembly through peaceful assembly at demonstrations, marches, and rallies. 

The VPD officers who have been assigned to work at these demos deserve to be recognized for their respectful engagement, professional behaviour, and conduct. 

They have done an excellent job of balancing public safety, environmental threats that have sprung up (see below) and the needs and rights of citizens to give voice to their warranted concerns about events that have, and are unfolding in BC, and in Canada. 

Fact 7: The individuals who have incited hatred, and violence, and have engaged in criminal acts of violence toward others at any previous demos, and those who have been arrested, have primarily been individuals who have identified themselves as local members and participants of so-called, "progressive," "anti-racist," and/or "Antifa" groups. This is information I  received directly from the VPD. 

I have personally, and indirectly (via videos), witnessed acts of violence, and physical assaults, threats, and hate speech from individuals toward peaceful marchers and protesters, including children. I have witnessed people wearing clothing that indicates they are "Antifa" "activists." 

I have personally witnessed individuals throwing glass and and plastic bottles at, or into these peaceful crowds of marchers -- even from several stories up in buildings where the spineless cowards who did this hid so no-one could see them. Make no mistake about this -- children and youth have been participants in exercising their civil rights to be heard about the issues impacting them under COVID-19, as well as their rights to assemble and associate with others. These children and youth, including young people with special needs, were put at-risk from hateful, anti-social, bigoted, intolerant, and violent adults who have thrown objects and missiles into these crowds. 

There is not a shred of doubt in my mind, and my considerable experience over the past 25 years of attending Vancouver demos and rallies, that agent provocateurs, are attending these events. It has been quite easy to spot these anti-social, pathological and vile individuals who are behaving in bad faith. They engage in behaviour that is dangerous, reckless, callous, and with malicious intent. The unethical actions of these nefarious and malevolent bad actors, subversion operatives, and well-organized, trained and resourced "activists" is a well known phenomenon to all parties involved, and all over the world where they are crawling out of their parents' basements to play "activist" for the day. 

As a real activist, and an advocate committed to peaceful assembly, demonstration, protest, and non-violence, I find these individuals, and their "groups" to be loathsome, foolish, and gullible. While they are out in the streets causing chaos, and engaging in acts of violence, bigotry, and hate, destroying their own lives and futures, they are considered low-hanging fruit, and easy to exploit by the chain-of-command. They are too dim-witted, and/or brainwashed to even understand how they are being used as the foot soldiers in a losing "war" -- a war that threatens the lives and futures of these fools without them even knowing it. 

Fact 8: Freedom of Association is a Charter right. No-one has a right to threaten, impede, interfere with, or deprive Canadians of that right. 

The letter the VDLC is circulating threatens the constitutional rights of all Canadians, under sec. 2(d). This letter clearly and intentionally sets out to deceive, manipulate and to intimidate, silence, and invoke fear and worry for those who wish to associate, and meet with like-minded individuals at this demo, march, and rally, or future ones. It does so by painting individuals who do wish to, or do attend in a false, pejorative, and malicious manner, including such defamatory and inflammatory labels as the following: 

  • "far-right threat;" "fringe groups;" "extremists;" "paranoia and misinformation;" 
  • "dangerous movement;" "conspiracy believers;" "anti-vaxxers;" 
  • "white supremacists;" "neo-Nazis;" "bigotry and hate;"
  •  "COVID deniers"; 
  • "violent neo-fascist movement to grow and threaten society"

This deceitful, manipulative, gaslighting, and defamatory letter, and this statement, in particular, attempts to position and frame peaceful demonstrators and civil liberties advocates as domestic terrorists is a disgraceful, egregious, and reprehensible sham (and it is guaranteed to backfire on all who participated in this letter and campaign): 

"We are particularly concerned about the immediate threat this full weekend convergence poses to workers in the service and transit sectors.We have already seen members of this extremist movement confront workers and passersby around the issue of wearing a protective mask. These may or may not have been isolated individual events. We are afraid that weekend will see groups of these extremists instigating violence. Such cowards are emboldened when they have large numbers." 

This is called, projection, a pathological behavioural and defense mechanism. This describes members of "anti-racism," "Antifa," or other low level "activists" perfectly. Brave in numbers while bullying, mobbing, harassing, threatening, yelling, and trying to cancel others. 

I guarantee you, and all of the individuals who demonstrated significant lapses in judgement who signed this letter, I am none of those things. I am a Registered Social Worker (RSW), forensic investigator, researcher and scientist. I am also writer, and as noted above, I have been a civil and human rights activist, and advocate for decades. All of these things have directly arisen out of my experiences as a front line social worker, therapist, and other professional roles I have played working with the most vulnerable and marginalized people in BC. 

I take the exercise of my constitutional/Charter rights seriously. I live by these values and rights, including, when and where able, the right to freedom of belief, association, assembly, and participate in political action. 

I will not tolerate any individual, group, organization, or elected official defaming me, or broadly defaming and making false claims about this broad-based movement of individuals and groups who share a common thread -- preserving, protecting, and repairing the fractured constitutional and civil rights of all Canadians in BC, and Canada. 

Fact 9: Canadians have a right to Freedom of Peaceful Assembly, pursuant to sec. 2(c). As noted above, it has not been the participants in previous marches and rallies who have posed risks to individual, or public safety. It has been cowards, bigots, and anti-democratic bad actors who have  posed those risks. Beyond risks, these individuals have engaged in deliberate and volitional acts of violence, Criminal Code violations, inciting hatred, and committed cowardly acts of potential child abuse, assault and violence toward children, and youth, including kids with disabilities and special needs. I have directly witnessed these acts and actions that placed children and youth at-risk of harm.

Fact 10: Canada is facing numerous domestic and international threats to our national security.  This includes domestic, bio-security, international and trans-national security risk and threats to our country, and to Canadians. This is a well-evidenced fact that is known to many within Canada, and external to Canada. 

This includes our allies in the Five Eyes Intelligence, and the intelligence and security community in Canada. Many sources have been warning Canadians for years about threats to our country, and to democracy from various bad actors. Many wonder why these warnings have not been heeded, or acted upon. I am one of those individuals. This question deserves answers. 

What individuals, groups, and organizations that pose threats to democracy, civil society, and the constitutional rights of Canadians, and to Canadian values is an ongoing issue, and dialogue. 

In an effort to delve into this, to enhance knowledge and understanding of these matters, I have written the article below, which I would strongly suggest people review. 

Part 1: Terrorism in Canada: Terrorism Laws, Activities and Groups. Retrieved from: https://canadianadvocacycentre.blogspot.com/2020/10/part-1-terrorism-in-canada-terrorism.html 

Fact 11: Canada is facing an unprecedented constitutional crisis. This is being encouraged, tolerated, and ignored by many groups in society -- including the trade union movement. 

The threats to democracy, the rule of law, and civil society Canada is facing are by internal, and external entities. There is substantive material evidence available to suggest that the interference with, the deprivation of, and the subversion of the constitutional rights of Canadians has led, in part, to this constitutional crisis. 

The violations of the constitutional rights of the people of BC has been, not just noted by activists like myself, it has also been reviewed, researched, and reported on by a wide range of individuals and groups. More formally, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), after a thorough analysis of the actions taken by the BC government in 2020, made the following findings:

- "There is little doubt that government restrictions on citizens’ freedom to move, travel, associate, assemble and worship are violations of the rights and freedoms protected by the Charter. 

- The B.C. Government’s lockdown measures of enforced social distancing and isolation violate our Charter freedoms of association, 2 peaceful assembly,3 mobility and travel,4 liberty, 5 security of the person, 6 and conscience and religion.7 

- Even in July of 2020, these measures continue to have a severe and negative impact on British Columbians’ access to healthcare, which violates the Charter section 7 rights to life and security of the person.8 

- Finally, these measures have had - and will continue to have - a severe impact on B.C.’s economy, with a predictable negative impact on the ability to pay for healthcare." 

Through my commitment and adherence to my professional Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice as a RSW, I have devoted a significant amount of my time and energy in 2020 to exposing, naming, and voicing the concerns, suffering, and civil and human rights violations, and the disproportionate impacts on different groups of individuals in BC. 

I have exercised my right to Freedom of Expression to "speak truth to power." I have used evidence-based science, data, and information from governments to inform the public, and people with societal power, about the realities of COVID-19  in BC. This is an example of one of the infographics I have used to show people who low the prevalence rates are in BC, while the BCNDP has kept the citizens of BC in a State of Emergency since March 18th, 2020, one they have no plan to ever let us get out of: 

I have created online social media campaigns, written letters and submissions (which have been ignored) confronting the BCNDP government, and the Canadian government over the mass violations of citizens' rights under the Charter that have never been supported by evidence-based science, best practices, or research. 

I have pleaded with governments to improve protections, and not ignore the plight of those who have been most impacted by the "measures" taken to "manage" COVID-19. All of which have been to the great detriment of the most marginalized, vulnerable, and at-risk people, and communities in BC. I have gone to all of these efforts because I am Canadian. With all of our faults, and our shameful history, Canada is worth fighting for. In my career as a social worker and therapist, many immigrant and refugee clients have told me that they worked hard to come to Canada because it is a better place than where they came from. I will continue to fight for my civil and human rights, and the rights of other Canadians. 

Conclusion

I see this VDLC letter as a form of intimidation intended to invoke fear in members of the public, and individuals and groups who are planning to attend. It has been written and disseminated to silence and attack Canadians who are freely exercising their Charter rights and freedoms. It is an anti-democratic letter that has no place in a civil society. 

I also see this letter as something much worse, and more dangerous -- this letter appears to be foreshadowing, and perhaps could/should be seen as a rally call, and an incitement to bad actors to threaten, instigate, provoke, and/or carry out acts of hate and violence at this rally.

Acts of violence committed by individuals who present themselves as members of the "left," "left-wing," or "progressives" have led to massive civil unrest, and civil war that is ongoing in the United States. This destructive, societal breakdown ideology and the kinds of actions taking place in the US cannot, must not, and will not be tolerated. This is the line in the sand. This will not take root in BC, or Canada. Those who are responsible for encouraging this kind of subversion in our province, or in Canada, will be held accountable and responsible by all of the rules and laws of Canada. 

I am calling for the immediate resignation of Mr. Stephen von Sychowski, President of the VDLC, due to the role he has played in organizing, deceiving, manipulating, and subverting the constitutional rights of the citizens of BC, and Canada through the drafting and distribution of this letter. 

If Mr. von Sychowski will not resign, I am calling on the executive board of the VDLC to call an emergency meeting and use all legal processes and mechanisms available to the VDLC to terminate Mr. von Sychowski for exposing this venerable organization, and its member-unions and delegates to an unacceptable level of risk.

I am calling on the VDLC Board to publicly denounce this anti-democratic, unconscionable, and unconstitutional behaviour and conduct in the name of the VDLC. I am calling on member-unions and delegates for those unions to publicly denounce this letter, the VDLC, and resign from this organization if they will not make this situation right, or whole.

These actions have brought the VDLC, and by extension, its delegates, into disrepute, and, perhaps much worse. The actions, and potential foreshadowing of the "violence," and "danger," and "threats" mentioned in this letter, which bears Mr. von Sychowski's name as VDLC President, may have made the VDLC, and its Board, into accessories in the commission of criminal code offences in Canada.

I am calling for the misguided individuals, groups, elected officials, and organizations that have signed this letter to immediately and publicly renounce their support of this letter because their actions constitute an act of interference and subversion of the constitutional rights of the citizens of BC and Canada. This is abusive, and undemocratic behaviour and conduct.

I believe some of the individuals who signed this letter, or allowed their organization to be named, should resign from their positions of leadership for their participation, and the exposure of their memberships, groups, or organizations to become involved in what should be considered acts of subversion in a democratic nation.  Their involvement also signals their disrespect and repudiation of the laws of Canada, and the rights of Canadians to advance and exercise their constitutional rights under those laws. This could make these individuals, groups and organizations accessories to potential Criminal Code violations, or other legal consequences, should anything occur.

It is also important to note that this letter also exposes individual VDLC Board members (and signatories to the letter) to being identified by domestic and international intelligence and security organizations as potentially being considered security threats, being added to "watch lists," and/or other intelligence and security lists. All of these occurrences could have far-reaching impacts for these individuals within Canada, and outside of our nation.

It is anathema to civil society, or in a democracy, that any individual, groups, elected officials, or organizations would participate in the subversion, risk, or threat to other citizens' exercise of their guaranteed and inalienable civil rights to democratically protected rights and fundamental freedoms under the Canadian Charter. The rule of law must be respected and adhered to in Canada, by all Canadians, and other residents of Canada. 

Individuals, groups, elected officials, or organizations that feel entitled to engage in threatening actions, or the use of words to intimidate, silence, or threaten the civil and democratic rights of others in Canada should be seen to pose a risk of subverting and threatening democracy and civil society in BC, and in our country.

To that end, I am making the VDLC letter, including the signatories, and my response to this letter public. 

I have alerted the appropriate authorities as to the public safety risks and threats that may be posed as a result of this letter, and what it is signalling about potential actions that may impact the individual and public safety, health and well-being of Canadians, and other residents of Canada, who choose to attend the BC Freedom Rally on October 17th and 18th, 2020, or any other future events that are protected to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Sincerely, 

Tracey Young, MSW, RSW


Additional References

Constitutional Rights Centre Inc. Retrieved from: https://www.constitutionalrightscentre.ca/.

Government of Canada. Charterpedia. Retrieved from: https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/index.html

Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms. Benefits assumed, harms ignored: A Charter Analysis of British Columbia's Response to COVID-19. Retrieved from: https://www.jccf.ca/published_reports/benefits-assumed-harms-ignored-a-charter-analysis-of-british-columbias-response-to-covid-19/.

Statement of Claim from Vaccine Choice Canada et al. v. Canada, Ontario, Toronto, the CBC and others. Retrieved from: https://vaccinechoicecanada.com/media/press-release-legal-challenge-to-covid-19-measures-filed-in-ontario-superior-court/.

Part 1: Terrorism in Canada: Terrorism Laws, Activities and Groups

Many Canadians appear to have a poor understanding of what constitutes terrorism, terrorist actions, and what might be considered participating in a terrorist group, or organized terrorist activities. 

Terrorism Laws in Canada

Section 83.0(1) of the Criminal Code of Canada outlines what is considered terrorist activities in Canada, relevant sections include the following: 

(a) an act or omission that is committed in or outside Canada and that, if committed in Canada, is one of the following offences:

See full list of offences here:

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-13.html#docCont

  • (b) an act or omission, in or outside Canada,

    • (i) that is committed

      • (A) in whole or in part for a political, religious or ideological purpose, objective or cause, and

      • (B) in whole or in part with the intention of intimidating the public, or a segment of the public, with regard to its security, including its economic security, or compelling a person, a government or a domestic or an international organization to do or to refrain from doing any act, whether the public or the person, government or organization is inside or outside Canada, and

    • (ii) that intentionally

      • (A) causes death or serious bodily harm to a person by the use of violence,

      • (B) endangers a person’s life,

      • (C) causes a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or any segment of the public,

      • (D) causes substantial property damage, whether to public or private property, if causing such damage is likely to result in the conduct or harm referred to in any of clauses (A) to (C), or

      • (E) causes serious interference with or serious disruption of an essential service, facility or system, whether public or private, other than as a result of advocacy, protest, dissent or stoppage of work that is not intended to result in the conduct or harm referred to in any of clauses (A) to (C),

and includes a conspiracy, attempt or threat to commit any such act or omission, or being an accessory after the fact or counselling in relation to any such act or omission, but, for greater certainty, does not include an act or omission that is committed during an armed conflict and that, at the time and in the place of its commission, is in accordance with customary international law or conventional international law applicable to the conflict, or the activities undertaken by military forces of a state in the exercise of their official duties, to the extent that those activities are governed by other rules of international law. (activité terroriste)

See video: NP Explainer: Anti-Terrorism Bill (C-51)

National Post. (2018). NP Explainer: Anti-Terrorism Bill (C-51). Youtube. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aOIzw7_M5M.

[Editor: Blogger will not allow the video to be displayed in a video format, link is provided]. 

Why People Are Opposed to Bill C-51

CBC News (2015). Why People Are Opposed to Bill C-51. The National. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wt3Y5S_PVY


Anti-Terrorism Act (2001)

  • Assented to on December 18, 2001. 

Link: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/a-11.7/page-1.html.


How is a Terrorist Group Defined in Canada?


Participating, Facilitating, Instructing and Harbouring

Marginal note:Participation in activity of terrorist group

  •  (1) Every person who knowingly participates in or contributes to, directly or indirectly, any activity of a terrorist group for the purpose of enhancing the ability of any terrorist group to facilitate or carry out a terrorist activity is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years.


List of Terrorist Entities from the Canadian Government:

Current list: https://www.securitepublique.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/cntr-trrrsm/lstd-ntts/index-en.aspx


Inciting Hatred and Violence As a Terrorist Activity

Canada also has laws against inciting hatred and violence. 

There is substantive material evidence that there are individuals, groups and organizations in Canada who are attempting to subvert democracy and the constitutional and civil rights of Canadians, pursuant to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, through the deceptive, malicious and manipulative use of incitement of hatred and violence. I believe that this is a threat to Canada, Canadian values, and the constitutional rights of Canadians and civil society. 

Some of these individuals are in positions of power and authority, and represent groups and organizations. These are not the usual types of groups, or organizations Canadians would associate with terrorism, or engage in terrorist activities. 

I believe the definition of what constitutes a terrorist organization should be expanded and enhanced to include these groups who are clearly working to subvert civil society and democracy in Canada.


Public incitement of hatred

  •  (1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of

    • (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

    • (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

  • Marginal note:Wilful promotion of hatred

    (2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of

    • (a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or

    • (b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.

Definitions

(7) In this section,

communicatingincludes communicating by telephone, broadcasting or other audible or visible means; (communiquer)

identifiable group has the same meaning as in section 318; (groupe identifiable)

public place includes any place to which the public have access as of right or by invitation, express or implied; (endroit public)

statements includes words spoken or written or recorded electronically or electro-magnetically or otherwise, and gestures, signs or other visible representations. (déclarations)

References

Government of Canada. (1982). Constitution ActCanadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Retrieved from: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-15.html.

Government of Canada. Criminal Code of Canada: Terrorism. Retrieved from: https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-13.html#docCont.

Government of Canada. Counter-terrorism Strategy. Public Safety Canada. Retrieved from: https://www.securitepublique.gc.ca/cnt/ntnl-scrt/cntr-trrrsm/cntr-trrrsm-strtg-en.aspx.

Saturday, October 3, 2020

#PoliticalGaslighting: What Politicians Do to Lie, Manipulate & Subvert Citizens from the #Truth

 


Gaslighting Defined: 

"Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation that seeks to sow seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or group. It makes them question their own memory, perception and sanity.

The tactic relies on persistent denial, contradiction and lying in an attempt to delegitimize the victim’s belief.

Psychology Today: “It works much better than you may think. Anyone is susceptible to gaslighting, and it is a common technique of abusers, dictators, narcissists, and cult leaders. It is done slowly, so the victim doesn’t realize how much they’ve been brainwashed.”

Psychologist Bryant Welch, who wrote a 2008 book entitled State of Confusion: Political Manipulation and the Assault on the American Mind, told NBC News that President Donald Trump uses the tactic regularly with the American people.

Said Welch: “The very state of confusion they are creating is a political weapon in and of itself. If you make people confused, they are vulnerable. By definition they don’t know what to do.

He added: “You come in and undercut their trust in the established sources of information. It tells them to go ahead and hate this person who is delivering bad news. Then you begin to substitute your own news, your own version of reality. If Donald Trump can undercut America’s trust in all media, he then starts to own them and can start to literally implant his own version of reality.”

11 Warning Signs of Gaslighting

1. They tell blatant lies.

2. They deny they ever said something, even though you have proof.

3. They use what is near and dear to you as ammunition. 

4. They wear you down over time.

5. Their actions do not match their words.

6. They throw in positive reinforcement to confuse you.

7. They know confusion weakens people.

8. They project.

9. They try to align people against you.

10. They tell you or others that you are crazy.

11. They tell you everyone else is a liar.

References

Political dictionary. Gaslighting. Retrieved from: https://politicaldictionary.com/words/gaslighting/.

Sarkis, S. (2017). 11 Warning Signs of Gaslighting. Psychology Today. Retrieved from: https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/here-there-and-everywhere/201701/11-warning-signs-gaslighting.



  11 Types of Workplace Harassment (and How to Stop Them) Source: Case IQ. 11 Types of Workplace Harassment (and How to Stop Them). Retrieve...